Weiss

4.0 / 10

A documents-only review of Weiss based on archived terms and the Anjouan register: what clause 7.6 reserves, what the licence conflict shows, and what is missing.

The short answer

The archived terms do not state a sign-up document requirement, but clause 7.6 lets WEI$ request any documents for KYC at its discretion, including in connection with refund requests. No monetary threshold is published, so the request cannot be predicted from the wording this page read.

The facts, as their source has them

Every line here was read off a page the operator owns or off a licence register, and carries the link it was read from. A field that could not be read says so. No gap is filled with an estimate.

Licensing authority: Anjouan Gaming Board
Licence number: ALSI-202508047-FI2 Open the register entry
Holder named in the register: Sorta Group Limitada
Status in the register: valid
Established: Not published by the operator
Verification clause: 7.6 Open the operator's terms
Published verification threshold: Not published by the operator
Withdrawal cap in the terms: Not published by the operator
Coins in the cashier: Not published by the operator
Refused-country list: Not published by the operator
Facts checked on: 2026-08-26

Read from an archived copy of the operator's pages, not from the live site

This review is a reading of the operator's published terms and its entry in a licence register. No account was opened, no money was deposited and no game was played. Terms change without notice, and the operator's own page is the authority on them.

Where this number comes from

4 of 10 points

Each component below reads one field taken from the operator's own terms or from the register of the authority that licensed it. The denominator is a fixed ten, so disclosure raises the number and silence costs points.

Licence in the register2.5 / 2.5
Anjouan Gaming Board ALSI-202508047-FI2, register status: valid
Clarity of the verification clause1.5 / 2
verification is described in clause 7.6, with no figure
No verification at sign-up0 / 1
verification is required or reserved from the start

Components with no data read

Publishes its refusal list · Coins settled in · Breadth of accepted markets

These count neither for the operator nor against it, but they stay in the denominator.

The full method

Weiss is a crypto casino brand operating at weiss.bet. The register entry names the licence holder as Sorta Group Limitada. This page is a reading of an archived copy of the operator's terms and of the Anjouan register, checked on 2026-08-26. It does not open an account, deposit, play or withdraw.

Because the pages were archived, this review does not claim the wording is current. The reader should confirm the current terms on the operator's own terms page before relying on anything here. What this page can do is say what the archived wording actually recorded and where the gaps are.

The operator's own pages conflict in places: the site shows one licence number, the register shows another, and different pages name different licensing authorities. Those conflicts matter for anyone deciding whether to deposit, and they are set out below rather than smoothed over.

What is Weiss, and who operates it?

Weiss operates a crypto casino at weiss.bet. The Anjouan register names the licence holder as Sorta Group Limitada, but the operator's own pages do not consistently name the same licensing authority, as the next section explains.

This review is built from documents only. No account was opened, no deposit was made and no withdrawal was tested. The findings come from the archived terms, the AML policy as supplied, and the Anjouan register entry.

The pages were an archived copy checked on 2026-08-26. The live wording may differ; the reader should confirm the current terms themselves.

Who holds the licence, and what is it worth?

The Anjouan Gaming Board register records licence ALSI-202508047-FI2 as valid, with the holder named as Sorta Group Limitada. That is a documented entry, not an inference, and the register link is in the facts table.

The operator's own site shows a different number, GLH-OCCHKTW0701272019. Some pages refer to a Curacao Gaming Control Board Certificate of Operation, while an AML page refers to a Gaming Services Provider N.V. sublicense under a master licence. The supplied text does not resolve whether the two numbers are meant to be the same thing or which regulator would handle a dispute.

A reader facing a payment problem needs to know which authority to approach. The conflict between the site and the register is therefore a practical issue, not a curiosity. This page does not advise on the legal effect of any licence.

What do the terms say about verification, word for word?

Clause 7.6 of the archived terms says: "WEI$ shall have the right to request You to provide any document and information to make Your KYC check under KYC Policy." The word "any" is the operator's own, and the right is reserved "at its discretion". The terms also mention refund requests as one situation where this may arise.

The AML policy supplied describes customer identification and verification and ongoing monitoring, but no monetary threshold that would trigger a verification request is stated. The KYC Policy is linked but its text was not supplied, so this review cannot quote what it adds.

The fact that a threshold is absent is itself the finding. No figure was omitted to make the page easier to read; none was there to read.

When does the document request actually arrive?

The archived terms do not state a sign-up document requirement. They reserve the right to ask later, at the operator's discretion, and clause 7.6 says "any document and information". A request could come in connection with a refund, but the wording does not limit it to that.

Because no monetary threshold is published, this page cannot name a balance, withdrawal amount or action after which verification becomes likely. The honest answer is that the trigger is the operator's discretion, and the archived wording makes that discretion broad.

A reader who needs a predictable KYC point should treat this as unpredictable. If a request comes, the withdrawal or refund is likely to pause until the documents are supplied.

How does a withdrawal move, end to end?

The archived terms read for this page state no withdrawal cap. If a current cap exists, it would be in the cashier, which is where the operator's current figure appears. The coin list was not captured from the archived pages; the cashier is also where the assets the operator settles in are listed.

A withdrawal moves in two stages: the operator's approval, then the network's confirmation. No processing time for either stage was captured in the archived pages, so this review cannot put a number on them. The network confirmation depends on the asset and network chosen, not on the operator.

If clause 7.6 is invoked, the request can pause at the operator's approval stage until the player supplies the documents the operator asks for. That is a separate waiting period from the two above, and it is driven by the operator's discretion.

Who is Weiss for, and who should look elsewhere?

Weiss may suit a player who is comfortable confirming current terms themselves, who accepts that verification can be requested at the operator's discretion with no stated threshold, and who values that the register entry is recorded as valid. The archived terms also state no withdrawal cap, which some players will want to read as a starting point.

A player who needs a predictable KYC trigger, a clearly defined restricted list, or a single consistent licence story should look elsewhere. The restricted jurisdiction is mentioned but not defined in the supplied text, and the licence pages conflict. If not knowing exactly when a passport request may arrive is unacceptable, this operator's wording will not reassure.

The reader who should look elsewhere is not the one who dislikes the brand, but the one who cannot accept broad discretion in clause 7.6 and the unresolved licence-number conflict.

From opening an account to the withdrawal arriving

01
Read the current terms
Before depositing, open the live terms page and confirm clause 7.6 and the restricted jurisdiction wording for your country. The review read an archived copy checked 2026-08-26.
02
Open an account
Create an account at weiss.bet using the details the operator asks at that moment. This review did not open an account, so no screen sequence was observed.
03
Fund the account
Choose one of the assets the cashier lists. The archived pages did not name a coin list, so the cashier is the source for what is accepted.
04
Request a withdrawal
Enter the withdrawal in the cashier. The archived terms state no cap, but confirm whether a current cap appears there.
05
Supply documents if clause 7.6 fires
If WEI$ requests KYC documents under clause 7.6, the request may come at its discretion. The withdrawal or refund would pause until the documents are supplied.
06
Wait for two confirmations
After operator approval, the network must confirm the transaction. The archived pages did not state a processing time for either stage.

The exact wording behind these fields

Reproduced as it appears in the operator's own document, in its original language. It is not translated here: translating a contractual clause changes it, and a reader who opens the terms page should find the same words.

“Anjouan public register: ALSI-202508047-FI2, Sorta Group Limitada”
“WEI$ shall have the right to request You to provide any document and information to make Your KYC check under KYC Policy”

What you can confirm yourself

The Anjouan register records licence ALSI-202508047-FI2 as valid with the holder Sorta Group Limitada.
Clause 7.6 of the archived terms reserves the right for WEI$ to request any document and information for a KYC check at its discretion.
The operator's own site shows a different licence number, GLH-OCCHKTW0701272019, which should be checked against the register.
The terms mention Restricted Jurisdiction but the supplied text does not define the list; read it on the live terms page.
The cashier is where the current coin list appears; the archived pages did not name any asset.

Your country on this operator's list

No refused-country list could be read for this operator. An absent list is not acceptance: this page cannot say that any country is accepted, and the operator's own terms page is the authority.

An operator's list is a commercial document, not a statement of law. Several of the countries here prohibit gambling outright, and a country's absence from an operator's list does not make playing from it lawful. Local law is yours to check, and this page does not advise on it.

What works

The Anjouan register entry for ALSI-202508047-FI2 is recorded as valid with a named holder, Sorta Group Limitada.
The archived terms do not set a monetary KYC threshold, so verification is not tied to a published figure.
The archived terms read for this page state no withdrawal cap; the cashier is the place to confirm a current figure.
Clause 7.6 is specific enough to locate and quote, which lets a reader see the exact discretion being reserved.

What does not

The operator's own site shows a different licence number from the Anjouan register, and the licensing pages conflict between Curacao and Anjouan references.
No verification threshold is published, so the point at which a document request arrives is left to the operator's discretion.
Restricted Jurisdiction is mentioned but not defined in the supplied text, so the reader must find and read the list themselves.
No support channels were captured, so the page cannot describe what recourse looks like if a payment stalls.

Questions people ask about Weiss

Will Weiss ask me for a passport at sign-up?

The archived terms do not state a sign-up document requirement. Clause 7.6 reserves the right to request any documents for KYC at the operator's discretion, so a request may come later. No monetary threshold is stated.

Does Weiss have a valid licence?

The Anjouan register records ALSI-202508047-FI2 as valid with the holder Sorta Group Limitada. The operator's own site shows a different number, GLH-OCCHKTW0701272019, and the licensing pages conflict, so confirm the current status yourself.

Is there a withdrawal limit?

The archived terms read for this page state no withdrawal cap. If a current cap exists, it would appear in the cashier, which this review did not read live.

Which coins can I deposit and withdraw?

The archived pages did not name a coin list. The cashier is where the operator lists the assets it settles in, and that list should be checked before depositing.

Which countries are restricted?

The terms mention Restricted Jurisdiction but the supplied text does not define the list. Read the operator's terms page for your own country, and check your local law separately; this page does not advise on legality.

If I win, when will the money arrive?

No processing times were captured. After the operator's approval, the network must confirm the transaction. If clause 7.6 is invoked, the request pauses until the documents are supplied.

Bottom line

The archived terms and register entry give a mixed picture. The Anjouan licence is recorded as valid, but the site shows a different number and licensing pages conflict. Verification is reserved at the operator's discretion under clause 7.6, with no published threshold, and no withdrawal cap was stated. This is a workable starting point only for a reader willing to confirm current terms themselves and accept unpredictable KYC.

Facts last reviewed: 2026-08-26